<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SocialSpark Disaster</title>
	<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Web Development, Programming</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>I don't know, I don't get out as much as I used to, so maybe I'm not used to these social networks and their (slightly tacky) ways. Never bothered with FaceBook and all that stuff.

It still looks exactly as if they've said - we've got this service that works fairly well, social networking is the big thing, so how do we FaceBookify it all - artificially bolting on stuff that doesn't really have a chance of working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, I don&#8217;t get out as much as I used to, so maybe I&#8217;m not used to these social networks and their (slightly tacky) ways. Never bothered with FaceBook and all that stuff.</p>
<p>It still looks exactly as if they&#8217;ve said - we&#8217;ve got this service that works fairly well, social networking is the big thing, so how do we FaceBookify it all - artificially bolting on stuff that doesn&#8217;t really have a chance of working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank O.</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>yeah, like $10 million overall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, like $10 million overall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesseG</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>JesseG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>There's investor money in this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s investor money in this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank O.</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/05/08/socialspark/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree with you more.  Socialspark is the biggest waste of time and investor money that i've ever seen.  I guess with a million dollars you can make a pile of shit look like the best pile of shit you've ever seen, but in the end, it's still a big pile of shit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  Socialspark is the biggest waste of time and investor money that i&#8217;ve ever seen.  I guess with a million dollars you can make a pile of shit look like the best pile of shit you&#8217;ve ever seen, but in the end, it&#8217;s still a big pile of shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
