<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How about WordPress blogXML?</title>
	<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Web Development, Programming</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>From where we are at the moment, I was (idly) thinking about a parsing engine that took postContent - roughly XHTML - chopped it all up into nice XML and published it as an alternative in existing RSS feeds.

Microformats only from the 'standards' aspect of it, really - at one time microformats.org were promoting themselves as the arbiters/guardians of all this sort of thing.

A fork? From WordPress? I wouldn't want to upset Mr Mullenweg any more than I have already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From where we are at the moment, I was (idly) thinking about a parsing engine that took postContent - roughly XHTML - chopped it all up into nice XML and published it as an alternative in existing RSS feeds.</p>
<p>Microformats only from the &#8217;standards&#8217; aspect of it, really - at one time microformats.org were promoting themselves as the arbiters/guardians of all this sort of thing.</p>
<p>A fork? From WordPress? I wouldn&#8217;t want to upset Mr Mullenweg any more than I have already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Returning blog posts in XML is not a bad idea, the power afforded to you in using XSL to present XML as HTML would be fantastic though, as you say, a jump up in complexity as well as power.

This sounds a little like you want a fork from WordPress that dumps the current set of template tags, and templates in general, and uses XML. Either that, or it's a rather complicated plugin you're talking about.

I'm not sure where you gather the connection to Microformats or other semantic data formats from here though, returning data as XML is pretty standard in many other non-semantic applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Returning blog posts in XML is not a bad idea, the power afforded to you in using XSL to present XML as HTML would be fantastic though, as you say, a jump up in complexity as well as power.</p>
<p>This sounds a little like you want a fork from WordPress that dumps the current set of template tags, and templates in general, and uses XML. Either that, or it&#8217;s a rather complicated plugin you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you gather the connection to Microformats or other semantic data formats from here though, returning data as XML is pretty standard in many other non-semantic applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>@ David

oh yes, Foaf is dead alright</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ David</p>
<p>oh yes, Foaf is dead alright</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David D</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>David D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/03/31/so-where-is-wordpress-blogxml-when-you-need-it/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>The politics of this would leave Google as the winners again. They have blogger and is blogger in real competition with wordpress.com

Is FOAF really dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The politics of this would leave Google as the winners again. They have blogger and is blogger in real competition with wordpress.com</p>
<p>Is FOAF really dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
