<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google-Approved Links</title>
	<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Web Development, Programming</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Google doesnt need to see or follow the Adsense links, it has already sent the links</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesnt need to see or follow the Adsense links, it has already sent the links</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>@Carol - good try....

@Michael Hampton
Of course - but the problem with AdWords is that Google is on both sides of the argument, as it were, and it would be very surprising if launching page PR didn't play some role in "smart pricing" - they regularly drop hints about "content is king" when discussing it.
But since we don't know this for certain, I agree, you're right - the statement is too strong as it stands and needs some editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carol - good try&#8230;.</p>
<p>@Michael Hampton<br />
Of course - but the problem with AdWords is that Google is on both sides of the argument, as it were, and it would be very surprising if launching page PR didn&#8217;t play some role in &#8220;smart pricing&#8221; - they regularly drop hints about &#8220;content is king&#8221; when discussing it.<br />
But since we don&#8217;t know this for certain, I agree, you&#8217;re right - the statement is too strong as it stands and needs some editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Ads placed on AdWords gain no search engine ranking whatsoever, since search engines can't see or follow the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ads placed on AdWords gain no search engine ranking whatsoever, since search engines can&#8217;t see or follow the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codescheme.net/2007/04/23/google-approved-links/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Couldn't resist finding out whether you practice what you preach and have junked the default nofollow on wp comments!! - sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t resist finding out whether you practice what you preach and have junked the default nofollow on wp comments!! - sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
